home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- From: Ross.Bench@f69.n105.z1.fidonet.org (Ross Bench)
- Subject: Baltimore Sun 5-9-1991
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1993 03:03:41 GMT
- Message-ID: <1175@beacon.rain.com>
-
- MSGID: 1:105/69.0 2cc4826b
-
-
-
- From the Baltimore Sun 5-9-1991
-
-
- SURPRISE ! HORROR STORIES OF DRUGS IN THE WORKPLACE DON'T HOLD UP
-
- By David Morris
-
-
- St. Paul Minnesota
-
-
-
- It has been a while since drugs made the front page. So let me
- bring you up to date on recent findings about drug use that
- didn't make it to prime-time news.
-
- The National Institute on Drug Abuse reported that the giant
- utility Utah Power and Light, "spent $215 per employee per year
- less on the drug abusers in health insurance benefits than on
- the control group." Employees that tested positive for drugs at
- Georgia Power Company had a higher promotion rate than the
- company average. Workers testing positive only for Marijuana
- exhibited absenteeism some 30 percent lower than average.
-
- Scientific American, after exhaustive research, found that the
- studies usually cited to prove the dangers of drug use in the
- workplace were either shoddy or misinterpreted. Astonishingly,
- the magazine could identify only one study on workplace drug use
- that has passed through the standard peer review process for
- scientific evaluation.
-
- That one, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine,
- studied 180 hospital employees, 22 of whom had tested positive
- after being hired. It found "no difference between drug-positive
- and drug-negative employees" with respect to supervisor
- evaluations or performance. Except for one intriguing item:
- Eleven of the negatives had been fired during their first year
- on the job, but none of the positives.
-
- More recently the American Psychologist, a peer-reviewed
- scientific journal, reported on a 15 year study of the San
- Francisco-area children by researchers Jonathan Shedler and Jack
- Block of the University of California at Berkley.
-
- Their report reveals that adolescents who occasionally use drugs
- are healthier than both drug abusers and drug abstainers.
- Moreover, those who abuse drugs as teen-agers have distinct
- behavioral problems that were identifiable years before theri
- drug use began. Drug use is a symptom, not a cause.
-
- Says Mr. Shedler, "the most effective drug prevention programs
- might not deal with drugs at all."
-
- In an interview published in the National Review, Michael S.
- Gazzaniga, professor of psychiatry at Dartmouth Medical School,
- discussed several studies that found that drug use increases in
- groups under stress, but that "the rate of addiction doesn't go
- up no matter what the degree of stress. Most people can walk
- away from high drug use if their lives become more normal."
-
- The British journal New Scientist reports research that found
- the majority of those who become dependant on Cocaine return to
- moderate use or total abstinence without treatment.
-
- Finally, Florida State University conducted a study for the
- Florida legislature of 45,096 people arrested for drug possesion
- in 1987. Eighty-eight percent had never been arrested for
- property crimes like burglary. Says professor David Rasmussen,
- "this study suggests we are incarcerating people for the use of
- drugs when they do not commit other crimes and tend not to
- commit other crimes."
-
- What are we to conclude ?
-
- Relying on these and many other studies, the Washington-based
- Drug Policy Foundation, a beacon of reason in a sea of hysteria,
- offers the following framework. Stress causes drug use. The vast
- majority of those who use drugs are casual users. Those who use
- drugs tend not to commit other crimes. Drugs in the workplace
- are not a serious burden on productivity.
-
- Which isn't to say there is no problem. There is. But it's a
- problem caused more by making drug use a crime than by the use
- itself.
-
- "There is little argument that drug trafficking has played
- crucial role in spawning the rise of violent crime," the
- Washington Post recently observed. Gangs have spread from a
- localized phenomenon to nationally franchised businesses,
- financed by drug money and armed with ever-higher caliber
- weaponry. We're fueling a level of violence rarely seen before,
- a violence now spilling over into areas that don't involve
- drugs.
-
- We can't build new prisons fast enough to house all the drug
- users we want to put in them. In some states, education budgets
- are declining to guarantee sufficient money for jails. In our
- panic about drugs, we are willing to sacrifice not only our
- schools but our liberty. Forfeitures of property by drug users
- is rising into the hundreds of millions of dollars, and
- virtually all this revenue goes back into drug enforcement,
- creating an unhealthy symbiotic relationship between drug
- dealers and the police.
-
- Last year, for the first time, military troops were used on
- Marijuana raids. Strip-searches of high school students in
- Kansas and Missouri elicit little protest, even when no drugs
- are found. Anderson County, S.C., billboards announce, "Need
- cash? Turn in a drug dealer." Informers recieve as much as 25
- percent of the assets seized from drug raids.
-
- Public pronouncements notwithstanding, the evidence is piling up
- that the collateral damage from our War on Drugs far exceeds the
- damage from drug use itself.
-
-
-
- David Morris is a columnist for the St. Paul Pioneer Press.....
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- This article is a little out of date, but it is very pertinent to our
- present situation....
-
- Take Easy
-
- Ross
-
-
-
-
- .. Bureaucracy: a method for transforming energy into solid waste.
- * Origin: IMS BBS * +1 503-254-2817 * 16.8k ZyXEL (1:105/69)
-
-
-